Facebook is NOT Down with Privacy

facebook-1
Is it reasonable to expect privacy on social networking websites? Following a series of privacy downgrades on Facebook, the site’s founder Mark Zuckerberg explained his anti-privacy stance behind the changes saying that privacy on the web is not a “social norm.” This touched off a backlash from users. But, why are we so concerned about privacy when we’re the ones putting our information out there for all to see?

Think about it, in 2008 there were an estimated 133 million blogs on the Internet. Think of all the personal information that was being shared on those blogs each day. Likes, dislikes, names, locations, pictures, point being: people around the world are using the Internet to connect with others every minute. They are putting their information out there for the world to see. And what is Facebook if not a collection of millions of individual blogs?

With that said, I don’t think Mark Zuckerberg should be going around with his virtual sledge hammer knocking down whatever walls people put up around their information on Facebook. He is the one who designed and implemented those privacy options in the first place. And if people were offered those safeguards, than they should be allowed to keep them up. Regardless of how many times a day one of those said people updates her “status” to tell the world that she is awake, what she ate for breakfast, where she’s going to get drunk on a Friday, or that she washed her dog.

This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Facebook is NOT Down with Privacy

  1. Yes but a blogger most often than not goes by a false name or handle. So he or she can express themselves freely without fear of upsetting those closest to them. Their family, friends, work associates etc. They may be for/against gay marriage for example, or pro abortion (or not). On Facebook you are expected to use your real name.

    I think we all understand that we don’t have a lot of privacy in the real world. Google knows everything you’ve searched for, the banks know what you buy through your credit card statements, the police have snippets of you every time you walk past a security camera, you ISP knows what sites you visit, Amazon knows what books you’ve bought etc. But we are all individual needles in a huge haystack, and those examples are not really invasions of our ‘personal privacy’ if you want to call it that.

    How well do you know your neighbors? A lot of people know who their neighbors are but don’t really associate that much with them. You wouldn’t class them as friends (a lot do of course). But say you were an avid cyclist for example, and you found out your neighbor was in the ‘All cyclists should be run over’ group on Facebook. You wouldn’t confront them over it but you’d secretly think a little less of them wouldn’t you? Or if you found out your work colleague had racist attitudes that you didn’t agree with. You’d adjust your behavior and watch what you said around them. Even something as simple as asking someone out. If all you need do is look them up on the web to find out they’re ‘in a relationship’ why would you bother approaching them. That person might be unhappy in the relationship and hoping someone would approach them. But why would you if you know for sure you’ll be rejected. After all, they’re ‘in a relationship’ already aren’t they.

    Nobody cares what the big companies know about us, or the law, providing we’re not doing any wrong. It is part of living in this society or system and if it means the relevant ads go to the right people, so much the better. The problems arise when we all suddenly secretly know tidbits of information about those around us. It’s not natural and can lead to awkward situations or just plain avoidance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>